Letters From A Tory

Entries categorized as 'Andy Burnham'

Labour have no clue how to stop binge drinking

March 4, 2008 · 2 Comments

Dear Andy Burnham,

I’m not quite sure how you received a score of 7/10 for the impact of changes to the licensing laws in the UK.  I suspect it has something to do with the fact that your department awarded the score to itself, and seeing as government departments usually exaggerate the smallest hint of success, I would translate this as an admission that 24-hour drinking laws have been a shocking failure.

The “spike” in drink-related disorders in the early hours of the morning is no surprise.  British people will drink for as long as you let them, and while I don’t think that every pub closing at 11pm was a great idea, allowing people to drink themselves into oblivion all night shows a painful lack of understanding of the British mindset.  It’s all well and good saying ‘they do it in Europe’, but they’ve been drinking late for decades whereas you are stupid enough to force it onto the public in this country to disastrous effect.  Your new measures announced today are just embarrassing:

“A new ‘yellow card, red card’ alert system for supermarkets, off-licences, pubs and clubs that repeatedly breach the terms of their licences. At present the enforcement authorities only have a ‘red card’ sanction of revoking a licence if there are repeated failures. The ‘yellow card’ sanctions would encourage the authorities to take earlier action. In the example of supermarkets selling to underage drinkers or drunks, they would be restricted to one checkout till only for alcohol sales.”: Who cares about getting a yellow card?  Why should a shop have to repeatedly breach their license to get it revoked?

“A sharp increase in fines for drinking in designated public areas which have had a history of antisocial behaviour. The maximum fine for refusing to comply with a police request to stop drinking is to be increased from £500 to £2,500″: What is it with Labour and fining people?  Who is this going to scare?  The police are rarely around when people behave anti-socially and the threat of a larger fine will not deter anyone.

“An extension of the use of juvenile acceptable behaviour contracts - short of an Asbo - for drink-related behaviour”: Oh great.  Well done.  That’ll help, won’t it.  More ASBOs, more stigmatisation, more ‘badges of honour’ for underage drinkers.

A curb of underage sales of alcohol in shops through tougher enforcement action. The ‘three strikes and you’re out’ penalty against shopkeepers who commit three offences in three months is to be increased to two in three months.”: I bet those dodgy retailers will be quaking in their boots.  If they get caught, behave for a few months, then start selling to underage kids again.

The drinks industry taking action to stop irresponsible promotions.”:  The drinks industry will not take action unless the penalties they face will cost them too much.  And what the hell classes are ‘irresponsible promotions’?  Isn’t that normally referred to as ’advertising’?

Let me explain a far simpler approach.  You have to deal with the causes, not the symptoms.  Firstly, any shop caught selling to underage drinkers will have their license for selling alcohol removed immediately and permanently and fined £10,000 or more.  No arguments, no appeals.  Secondly, the age for purchasing alcohol anywhere apart from a pub or bar should be raised to 21 and the only acceptable ID will be a driving license or passport.  In short, the government’s measures will achieve nothing - you have to be more aggressive if you want to stop this.

Yours sincerely,

A.Tory

Categories: Andy Burnham · Under-age drinking

Labour gambles with gambling laws

February 27, 2008 · 4 Comments

Dear Andy Burnham,

I have no doubt that many campaigners breathed a collective sigh of relief after you announced that the planned super-casino in Manchester is to be scrapped.  Having said this, Labour is still more than happy to let gambling destroy the lives of millions of people just to get their hands on more corporation tax.

The fact that the super-casino will not be built is irrelevant, seeing as you are still happy for 16 large casinos to be built around the country.  To say there are “important differences” between one super-casino and 16 large ones is a ridiculous argument, seeing as the total amount of gambling that will be encouraged is far greater with 16 separate casinos and will do more damage to British society over a larger area.  I bet the casino owners will be quaking in their boots at the pathetic ’safeguards’ you have outlined.  Forcing casinos to shut for six hours a day limits the public to a mere 18 hours of solid gambling a day, which is hardly going to protect anyone.  Banning credit card use is also ridiculous as many people on low incomes don’t have credit cards or will just pop to the hole-in-the-wall beforehand or receive benefit payments in cash - all of which will sidestep the ban, and banning free drink promotions is such a token gesture that I don’t even know where to begin criticising it.

Gambling destroys careers, families and lives.  You know that, I know that, everyone knows that.  Labour’s obsession with trying to get more corporation tax through gambling just to fill the black holes in the public purse is preying on the weak and is completely wrong.

Yours angrily,

A.Tory

Categories: Andy Burnham · Gambling

This is getting ridiculous

October 13, 2007 · No Comments

Dear Andy Burnham,

I am getting sick and tired of this.  Talk about a lack of vision and originality - your interview in the Telegraph has made it perfectly clear that Labour are about to steal yet another Conservative policy.

After the backlash against Alistair Darling’s policy theft, I thought I was on fairly safe ground by assuming that Labour had learnt their lesson about how the electorate views such behaviour.  To read this morning that despite many objections within Labour Party you will now press ahead with changing the tax system in favour of married couples is astonishing.  It alarms me how the tax system penalises married couples in many instances and I’m glad that you’ve finally seen sense, but it’s got to the point where the Conservatives announce any policy they like, set the agenda, and along come Labour within a fortnight and just openly grab the policy and present it as their own.  The government is treading water and you know it.

Yours in disbelief,

A.Tory

Categories: Andy Burnham · Family